Question:
May a manager or landlord could legally deny access to a
rental to smokers? Or could a smoker be considered addicted to a
legal drug (nicotine) and protected under the status of
handicapped?
Answer: While I am not aware of
any case law regarding this issue, I suspect a case could be
made that smoking is an addiction, covered under the
handicapped/disability classification of the Fair Housing Laws.
However, it is legal to prohibit certain activities, such as
smoking, on the rental premises.
Therefore, a
manager/landlord may want to consider advertising the rental
property as a “non-smoking” property. She should also be sure
the lease agreement prohibits smoking in or on the
premises. Keep in mind that, in order to comply with Fair
Housing laws, you should always advertise the property, not the
tenants you are looking for!
Question:
What Can I Legally Say About My Former Tenants?
Answer: This question arose
after the issue in which we discussed tenant history and how to
ask the right questions.
That article
was written from the perspective of the landlord who is
investigating an applicant.
But sometimes,
the shoe is on the other foot. As a landlord, you may get a call
from another landlord or property manager who is investigating
an applicant who is your current or past tenant. What can you
say?
The basic rule
is to follow the advice given by Joe Friday (from the TV show,
Dragnet, for those of you old enough to remember!), and that is,
"The facts, ma'am, just the facts."
Do not give
personal opinions or feelings about your tenant or former
tenant.
What do most
landlords want to know? They want to know if the tenant paid the
rent on time.
If the tenant did
pay on time, say so; if he did not pay on time, say so only if
you have written records such as ledgers, to prove what you say.
What if the tenant
in question has been given notice to vacate or is being evicted?
Again, just the facts regarding history of rental payment that
you can substantiate.
|
|
Question:
I am considering renting to three roommates. They seem like
nice young people, but they are all moving out of their parents’
homes for the very first time. Their parents have volunteered to
be co-signers of the rental agreement. I have agreed to have
them as co-signers and want them each to guarantee the entire
amount of the rent. They object, saying that each should be
responsible for only one-third of the rent. Your opinion,
please, as to what the fair (and safe!) thing to do is!
Answer: The purpose of co-signers or guarantors of the
rental agreement is to establish who, other than the residents,
will be liable for the rent and other monies due under the
rental agreement. Co-signers or guarantors are often used when
an applicant has bad credit, or perhaps in the case of the young
people in the above example, no credit, as they are living on
their own for the first time. A co-signer or guarantor may also
be used when the landlord is not convinced that the applicant
has the financial ability to pay. Perhaps the applicant has had
past credit problems.
Your rental agreement calls for (or should call for) all of the
tenants to be “jointly and severally liable” for the payment of
rent.
This means that
each of the tenants is responsible, in full, for the entire
rental amount. If one roommate moves out, the other two who
remain in the property must pay the full rent, not just two
thirds of it. By the same token, you want all of your co-signers
to be liable for the entire amount of rent, not just one third
each.
our requirement
that they each sign that they will be “jointly and severally
liable” is reasonable.
Click
here for GUARANTEE OF RENTAL AGREEMENT FORM
|
WHEN ORDERING
FORMS & ARTICLES
PLEASE
NOTE:
You
will receive an email with a link to the download area with
a
PASSWORD.
Your
USERNAME
will be your email address you submitted when filling out
the purchase form. |
|